Using today's rubbish in the building of tomorrow
Earthship Australia
  • Home
  • Off-Grid Tips and Tricks 2021
  • Earthship Biotecture - What is it ?
  • Intro to Natural Building, Permaculture and Off-Grid Basics Online Series
  • How to become a member
  • Natural Building Website Subscriptions and Donations
  • News and Past events
    • Earthship Weekend Workshop - Melbourne- 13th/14th September
    • December Workshop
    • Earthship Ironbank 2014
  • Media
  • Resources
    • CERES Weekend Workshop Resources
    • User Guide for owner builders in Australia
  • Testimonials
  • Off-Grid Online Series
  • Videos
Resources for Earthship Biotecture www.earthship.com
Picture
http://earthship.co.nz/

Taos Blog

Glass Bottle Inspiration

Melbourne Based Daniel Hogan earthship designs - http://www.themeski.com.au/

Michael Green - Freelance journalist writing about Earthships

Manitoba Earthship, Canada

Bristol, UK earthcob Ship

Dan Richfield's Project - OffthegridBuild

Earthship founder talks going green in face of red tape - UniSa article

 Earthships in Australia – Would you build one?

 An Introduction to Earthships

Things to read pre build from the valhalla group

Plans to build housing estate from tyres

gubbsearthship.com/berm/ -- Gubb's Earthship, New Zealand

 Earthships in Australia

Moving from McMansions to Earthship, Martin Freney

 Thermal behaviour of an earth sheltered autonomous building - the Brighton Earthship

Guides for building grey water system and septic system: http://welikesmall.org/stuff/earthship/Guides/

Earthship in SA,
Martin Freney

Earthships in USA Today

Earthship Steampunk

Earthship Australia in EcoCitizen Magazine

Oscar and Lisa's Earthship (good ideas here)

Earthship Serbia http://www.centartesla.com/en/2012-09-02-First_Earthship_House_in_Serbia_built.htm

Earthship & Earthbag design

Earthship Cambodia

Earthship Montana


Earthship Malawi - Petal Project

Multi-Bioregion Earthships here


A Man, A Can, A Plan


Large Scale Engineering with Tyres, NSW - www.ecoflex.com.au/

Simple Survival - Off Grid World





General earth building resources and International examples:

Natural building website with excellent database ATAA

4Walls International - working in the border region recycling trash

Owner Builder -- http://www.theownerbuilder.com.au/current_issue.htm

http://www.greenhomebuilding.com/QandA/cob/structural.htm -- where you can find a wide range of information about sustainable architecture and natural building.

International Earth Building index

Milkwoods Reciprocal Roof


Papercrete construction


Thermal Survey - www.ebaa.asn.au/documents/ThermalSurveyof.pdf

Why Energy Efficient homes sometimes use more energy

Off Grid Living


SuperAdobe Building testing

Natural building blog
and pictures

Women building natural homes


CobWorks
North America

Cob building in Australia


Great articles on Cob houses:

http://www.tinyhouse...e-construction/
http://greenbuilding...house-for-5000/
http://small-scale.net/yearofmud/
Rogers Rammed Earth

House Plans:
http://www.solarhave...erStrawBale.htm
http://www.tinyhouse...ny-house-plans/
http://small-scale.n...me-house-plans/
http://opensourceeco...iki/House_Plans
http://www.worldchanging.com
http://www.freegreen...ouse-Plans.aspx
http://www.tinyhouse...ab-micro-house/

SuperaDobe in South Australia - http://www.1-1construction.com/

SuperAdobe in Haiti

Owen Geiger and Earthbag building

Melbourne Based Superadobe Builders Minha and Nick - http://www.permastructure.com.au/

Cob building and instruction


Cob Building in Finland - http://cobdreams.blogspot.co.uk/

Hassan Fathy- Inspired Regenerative Home Planned for Buddhist Center, Colorado-

Natural Building Blog, USA - http://naturalbuildingblog.com/

Discussion over Strawbale vs Cob here

Tiny thermal mass house


Eco Directory Australia -

Sustainable solutions for disaster affected communities  - builditbackgreen.org/bushfires

Earthbag Workshop at Milkwood Farm, NSW

Tamara's Permaculture Class notes, Upwey, Victoria

www.greywater.net/

Plastic Bottle Building in Africa - and in Nigeria

BottleBrick making


How to build a $50 underground house

Recycled House Project, Brighton UK


Strawbale Designs

hempcrete - http://dorjedenmaling.org/program-details/?id=137636
http://www.construction-technologies.com/lyfordg/Hemp/hemp.html
http://www.hemp.com/2010/08/hemp-houses-the-secret-of-building-sustainable-homes/


Article in Renew on a 9Star rated house in Melbourne's north here

Sustainability References

ATA - http://www.ata.org.au/projects-and-advocacy/

UTS Earth Building Research Forum - http://www.dab.uts.edu.au/ebrf/

UTS Research Papers - http://www.dab.uts.edu.au/ebrf/research/articles.html
"Durability of cement stabilised earth walls - http://www.dab.uts.edu.au/ebrf/research/durability.html

CERES Environment PArk and Resource Center, Melbourne - http://www.ceres.org.au/

http://www.littleecofootprints.com/2011/06/ceres_melbourne_community_environment_park.html

Earthship Home Made From Tyres Discussion Thread - http://www.byohouse.com.au/forum4/viewtopic.php?t=150

How to get off Fossil Fuels - http://www2.buildinggreen.com/blogs/getting-fossil-fuels

Earth Building Association of Australia -

Resource Based Communities - skills share website for skilled people -

Sustainable Building/Wwooffing website for sharing knowledge and getting help for your builds - ThePOOSH.org

Green Building Council of Australia - http://www.gbca.org.au/

Centre for Appropriate Technology - Alice Springs -- http://www.icat.org.au/our-work/

Australian Solar Council - http://auses.org.au/solarpedia/

www.greywater.com.au/howitworks.htm - Grey Water Systems

UK Green Building Register


Sustainability Blogs/Organisations/Articles

http://www.nerissadowling.com/

http://www.holmgren.com.au/

www.eco-shout.org

Permaculture Internship advice here

Earthship experience from one of our participants here


The Green Swing - http://www.thegreenswing.net/pages/96rutlandave/water.html

http://desertsmartcoolmob.org/ - Alice Springs

Association for the Protection of the Environment, Thailand, for alternative building ideas - http://www.a-p-e.org/

Long Way Home, Guatemala - http://lwhome.org/

4walls International - sustainable building projects USA/Mexico - http://www.4wallsintl.org/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hd7yZgboGkI

Green Films - Living in the Future

Types of IC Legal Structures Found in the Rainbow Region
New South Wales’ land laws were not designed to encompass ICs and therefore these
communities have had to adapt various legal means to secure their interest in the land they
live on. The following legal structures used to achieve this have all been tried in the Rainbow
Region with various degrees of success, though, for reasons of privacy, particular
communities cannot be identified here.
1. Strata Title
Under the
Strata Titles Act
it is possible to structure an IC so that each member has an
individual title over their house and curtilage, whilst contributing in cash or kind to the body
corporate which is responsible for overall supervision and management of the IC. However, this
Act was intended to apply to high-rise flats and not broad-acre communities and although there
is one example of this legislation being used for an IC in the Rainbow Region, the consensus
among its members seems to be that they find the structure unduly restrictive and inconvenient.
2. Community Title (CT)
The
Community Land Development Act
(NSW 1989) and the
Community Land Management Act
(NSW 1989) enable division of land into separate lots with their own titles that are held amongst
common property. The group that initially buys the land can thus retain control over common
lands and internal roads rather than have that control pass to the local council. However, locally,
councils have demanded from these communities much the same standards of development as
those required of ordinary subdivisions, resulting in substantial set-up costs, usually passed on
to individual buyers of the separate blocks. The upshot can be that block holders end up paying
virtually freehold prices for their lots. An advantage of CT is that it enables a very wide range of
possible internal arrangements concerning, for example, communal facilities, rules re ideology,
farming practices, conservation, pets, building standards, etc.
Yet the ideology of this legislation, being largely developer-driven, militates against the
development of a community ethos in that it promotes the interests of the individual lot holders
at the expense of the community. Unless this is catered for in the internal regulation of the IC it
can lead to the overtaking of the community by speculators whose interests lie in profit-taking
rather than the establishment of a genuine community.
3. Company Structures
Locally, companies
47
have often been found to be perhaps the most suitable structures for
aspiring ICs because of their ease of set up, flexibility, and limited liability of members for any
debts of the company itself. Unlike CT structures they can be set up quite cheaply, with minimal
ongoing costs of an annual company return fee presently of about $200. Possible pitfalls
experienced by local company-structured ICs include the danger that unless restraints are put in
place governing share transfers and the price of shares and improvements, normal market forces
may operate such that the IC has little control over who buys into the community with a
consequent loss of communal identity and functions.
4. Co-operative Structures
In ideological terms, co-ops are probably the most suitable vehicles for the formation of an IC.
They are ideally democratic, self-help organisations that exist to provide services to members
rather than profits, and thus lend themselves to the purpose of setting up an IC. Under the
Co-
operatives Act
(NSW 1993), the powers and duties of co-ops are potentially wide and detailed
and can allow for the operation of businesses, buying groups and other activities. A particular
advantage of the co-op structure is the comprehensive safety net provided by the Act, which
covers common problems that may arise, such as disputes between members and liabilities of
the co-op.
5. Tenants-in-Common Structures
These structures enable a group of people to buy land together, but also for each of them to have
their own title deed to the land,
48
entitling them to a nominated proportion of shares in the land.
If one of the tenants dies, his or her share of the land passes to the person(s) named in that
person’s will. All tenants-in-common are entitled to use all of the land and to gain their
proportion of any rents over it. They do not, however, have any entitlement to possession of any
particular part of the property, though they can be empowered to lease parts of it for less than
five years, and such leases are renewable. The land can only be sold or mortgaged with the
agreement of all tenants-in-common and any structures erected belong equally to all. The
inherent danger here is that if such agreement cannot be arrived at, a court may order the sale or
partition of the property.
49
Although members can make internal agreements between
themselves, they cannot override the above restrictions relating to the land or fixtures
themselves.
6. Joint Tenancy Structures
These structures are similar to Tenancies-in-Common, with similar advantages and
disadvantages, except that on the death of one party their interest passes to the other tenant(s).
7. Trust Structures
Under these structures, a person, group or company can hold the legal title over land for the
benefit of others (the beneficiaries). Any change in the trustees requires a change to the
Certificate of Title over the land held with consequent legal and registration costs. A particular
danger of this structure that has been experienced in the region is that unless the trustees are a
part of the IC and living on the land, they may be or may become distant from the ideals and
needs of those living there. This could cause legal problems as the trustees have control over the
trust property. In recent years, changes to trust laws mean that many of the financial advantages
of trusts relating to distribution of trust income and tax rates no longer favour trusts over
companies and other legal structures.
8. Unit Trust Structures
In the past, this form of structure has been used to overcome the prohibition against subdivision,
but the ways employed to attempt to achieve this are of very dubious legality – they may well
not survive a challenge in the courts.
50
Under these structures, the community’s land is held in
trust by a company, from which shareholders hold leases – which are theoretically renewable –
over their blocks for periods of less than five years. They are relatively expensive to set up and
were not designed for use by ICs.
9. Incorporated Association Structures
It is possible for a group to set up an Association to hold land, providing it does not engage in
profit-making or trading.
51
However, this makes no provision for individuals to sell their
interests in the property, unless members have some arrangement whereby they lend money to
the Association on terms that satisfactorily cover their financial interests. Although such
Associations are relatively simple and cheap to set up – and grant limited liability for
individuals, the capacity to sue and perpetual succession – they were not intended for the
purposes of ICs and have not met with much success in the Rainbow Region.
10. Extended Family Structures
Some years ago, a case in NSW
52
established that a ‘family‘ need not necessarily be constituted
by blood or marriage relations, but can be made up of unrelated individuals, provided they all
eat together and demonstrate other aspects of family life. Council planning instruments provide
that a family home need not be just one structure, but may consist of several detached but
physically related buildings, as long as the separate buildings do not have separate kitchens or
bathrooms. However, although such structures may have been unofficially tried for rural land
sharing communities, they confer no legal rights on family members, such that there is no easy
way for individual members to recoup any money or ‘sweat equity’
53
they may have contributed
in the event of them wanting to leave.
11. Hybrid Structures
Some ICs have adopted two-tiered and other structures, where the first tier may be a co-
operative, company or incorporated association that holds the title to the land, and the second
tier an incorporated or incorporated association that is responsible for the day-to-day
management of the community.
Experience in the region suggests that, above all, the legal structure chosen is only as good as
the people constituting it, so that an internally cohesive group always has a better chance of
making an IC work, almost regardless of the IC’s legal structure. In contrast, no legal
structure will protect a community from dispute and expense if the communards are not of
like mind and interests. The more successful ICs tend to be those that gather the foundation
group together first and find the land they want once they are confident of the ability of all the
members to work and live together, rather than the other way around. This process is
facilitated by the common adoption of some ideological, political or spiritual principles by the
foundation group, which has the effect of keeping the group together and laying down
universally agreed principles of living together.
Despite the travails of almost 30 years of toil and struggle, the survival rates of ICs in the
Rainbow region have generally surpassed those of communities established in previous
centuries. This staying power should provide communards with hope for the future and ensure
that ICs remain as a pre-eminent feature of the region, while significantly contributing to its
economy and cultu

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.